Site icon Blaster Hub

NiZn Batteries – Why Isn’t This a Thing?

After seeing this post (with no replies) and looking into the topic, I grabbed a few Nickel-Zinc batteries of my own for testing. At least in stock blasters, the AA-sized batteries boost dart velocity by a noticeable margin. In addition, they’re rechargeable, can supply decent amounts of current, and are fairly inexpensive. However, there’s issues in reliability and longevity, and higher voltages aren’t always what they’re cracked up to be. In the end, there’s really not much to be gained in terms of Nerf, as far as I can tell.

(This is from the “stock blaster” perspective. If you’re actively trying to modify your blaster, there are plenty of guides on rewiring blasters as well as choosing appropriate batteries).

The Battery Basics

From https://rightbattery.com/381-1-6v-aa-1500-mah-turnigy-rechargeable-nizn-battery-tests/

Nickel-Zinc (NiZn) batteries are similar to nickel metal hydride (NiMH) batteries, but work at a higher voltage; NiMH has a nominal 1.2V, while NiZn has a nominal voltage of 1.65V. Charging is different (and requires a separate charger). However, it follows a similar profile as NiMH, holding a steady voltage while under use until it reaches the low end of its capacity.

It’s an old technology, with Thomas Edison himself holding a 1901 patent on a rechargeable NiZn battery system. However, the tech has seemingly fallen in and out of favor over the years. Early batteries used in vehicles didn’t have long lives in terms of the number of charging cycles, while later (better) attempts met other kinds of resistance – the rise of reliable NiMH and Lithium Ion batteries. Among other things, the Zinc electrode has a nasty habit of forming dendrites within the cell that can eat away at capacity and eventually render the battery useless.

Generally, NiZn cells work well with robust electronics that don’t like the lower voltages provided by NiMH.

Stock Blaster Usage

Note that I tested these batteries in particular, from HobbyKing.

NiZn batteries operate at a higher voltage than alkaline batteries. This means that, without the proper circuitry to step down the voltage, they do have the potential to fry cheap circuit boards. That being said, if you’re simply feeding current to flywheel motors, they can potentially drive the motors at higher speeds. If they can supply the increased current demand, then you can keep the motors from lagging between shots.

The stock Stryfe I tested fired 62-65fps on both alkaline and NiMH batteries. On NiZn batteries, it averaged 77fps.

Using an Adventure Force Double Trouble (which runs hot for a blaster), the velocity jumped from 92fps to 100fps. This of course requires six cells.

However…

The NiZn batteries I tested did what I expected, running the blaster motors faster. However, there are a few things to consider before deciding you should adopt them.

Last Thoughts

In the end, I’d prefer reliability over any slight performance gains. My opinion? Stick with the low self-discharge NiMH batteries if you want to save money and have blasters that will work even if you forget to charge them until a month later. I’ll continue testing the usefulness of these batteries, so opinions may change. However, do know this: if you’re chasing after performance gains, you’re better off starting down the road of actual blaster modification than you are trying to simply sub in different batteries.

NiZn cells do have some specialized uses, I’m just not sure that Nerf blasters are one of them yet.

Exit mobile version